Special

In the last few weeks, Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi has become extremely popular on Twitter. Some of Rahul's tweets have been retweeted by most people. BJP has become disturbed due to the growing popularity of Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi on Twitter.

Question of being questioned by ANI sponsored report on Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi's Twitter account. There is a debate between the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party regarding this sponsored report of the ANI.

ANI has said that after seeing Rahul Gandhi's OfficeofRG Twitter handle, some questions arise. The report has been questioned whether 'bots' are being used to make Rahul popular on Twitter?

On the other hand, Congress has alleged that the story is being fabricated by targeting Rahul Gandhi.

Twitterbot is a type of software that controls Twitter account via Twitter API. The boat software itself can increase the activities of retweets, likes, follow and unfollow.

Through this, the message is sent directly to any other account. In any person's Twitter account, there can be a large part of the likes, retweets and followers, in which there is no role of human hand.

Through the ANI sponsored report, Congress is being tensed on behalf of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Union Minister Smriti Irani tweeted, citing an ANI report, "Maybe Rahul Gandhi is preparing to contest elections in Russia, Indonesia and Kazakhstan?"

Congress leader Shahzad Poonawalla has responded to this attack by BJP. Congress leader Tahasin Poonawalla attacked on Smriti in question. Poonawala has tagged Smriti Irani and asked why is 'Prostitution Agency' re-tweeting PM Narendra Modi's tweet ? (Namaskar @ BJP4India SM cell & respected @smritiirani ji ma'am. Why are "escort agencies" re-tweeting my hon @narendramodi ji? 15th oct)

Like Ani has given an example in Rahul's tweet, Poonawalla has also introduced those who have been re-tweet to the tweet of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Poonawalla has also put forward some such people who have been re-tweet Modi's tweets, whose accounts seem suspicious.

Railway Minister Piyush Goyal has also targeted Rahul Gandhi in this matter and called him Farji Yuvraj. On Goyal's remarks, Congress spokesperson Sanjay Jha said that the Railway Minister is playing twitter games and the common man is struggling for a ticket.

Sanjay Jha has said in another tweet, "The entire Modi government is engaged in attacking Rahul Gandhi by resorting to a lucrative and sponsored report. BJP, why am I feeling that your end has begun? "

Another Congress spokesperson Priyanka Chaturvedi tweeted, "Why does not the Modi government make a full-time minister to attack Rahul Gandhi, in such a way other ministers will be able to do their job."

Several Congress supporters have given a sharp reaction to the support of Poonawala and against Smriti Irani's tweet.

Kannada actress and leader Ramya, who is seen in charge of the Congress's social media, attacked Smriti Irani while writing that why we need them, when you are?

In another tweet, Ramya wrote, "The story is factually incorrect. I understand your curiosity and the motivation of the Bots Janata Party. "(Story is factually wrong. Can you understand the I & B Ministry and the Bots Janata Party.)

Many other users also have tense on Smriti.

Bharatiya Janata Party has been surrounded by criticism of its own senior leaders and former leaders for some time now. This time, BJP's ex-chief minister of Gujrat attacked the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP in Gujarat.

Suresh Mehta was the Chief Minister of Gujarat from October 1995 to September 1996 of BJP. But he feels that the BJP's position may be in a turbulent phase in the forthcoming Gujarat elections.

According to Mehta, the BJP government in Gujarat has been taking decisions for anti-farmer and corporate interests. In the interview given to the news website 'The Wire', Suresh Mehta claimed that "Gujarat model of development will not sell this time ... Gujarat model is only a junkie of words. The truth about Gujarat lies in some other story."

When Narendra Modi was made Chief Minister of Gujarat instead of Keshubhai Patel, Mehta was in his Cabinet.

Suresh Mehta told The Wire, "In the year 2004, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) reviewed the financial condition of Gujarat. At that time the state government had debt between four and six thousand crores. Therefore, the CAG had warned the state not to be caught in the vicious circle of debt. But the government ignored the matter of CAG. According to the latest budget presented by the state government, in the year 2017, the debt on Gujarat has increased to one lakh 98 thousand crores. These are not my figures. These are the government's own figures. In February 2017, the state government has announced in a statement issued under the Gujarat Fiscal Responsibility Act 2005."

Suresh Mehta also accused BJP's Gujarat government of reducing the exemption given to farmers. Mehta told The Wire, ".... the same document shows what is the priority of the Gujarat government. The exemption (subsidy) to be given in the agricultural matter, which is being received by the farmers, is continuously decreasing from the financial year 2006-07. In the financial year 2006-07, Rs 195 crore and Rs 408 crore was given in the financial year 2007-08, which has been reduced to Rs 80 crore in the financial year 2016-17."

Mehta alleged that the BJP government of Gujarat, along with reducing the wages of the farmers, is increasing the exemptions in energy and petrochemical sectors that benefit the traders like Adani and Ambani.

Mehta said to The Wire, "... ... compare the exemption of this (farmers) exemption to the energy and petrochemical sector, which runs Adani and Ambani. In the financial year 2006-07, the exemption of 1873 crore received from these sectors increased to Rs 4471 crore (revised figures) in the financial year 2016-17.''

Mehta claimed that the budget of food and supplies affecting the poor and the common people also reduced by the BJP government from Rs 130 crore to Rs 52 crore.

Mehta alleged that PM Narendra Modi had announced that the money from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel statue of 'Statue of Unity' was also being funded from the Narmada project fund.

Mehta claimed that the Finance Minister of Gujarat told in the Legislative Assembly that Rs. 3000 crore has been given from Narmada project fund to make idol of Sardar Patel.

Mehta asked, how can the government spend money for the funding of irrigation and the farmers' interest on the idol?

Mehta surrounded Narendra Modi and said that before coming to his top, BJP was a different party.

Mehta told The Wire that he left the BJP 2007, due to the differences that started in 2002, from Narendra Modi.

The Election Commission has not announced the dates for assembly elections to be held in Gujarat, but before that, Gujarat has already been in the election mode.

Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi is visiting Gujarat several times. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has also visited Gujarat three times in a month.

It is believed that in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, the wave in India, including Gujarat, is not the wave today in BJP's favor.

In the 2014 general elections, BJP won all 26 Lok Sabha seats in Gujarat. At the same time, The BJP were cast 60 percent votes, but in the current period, the popularity of BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi has decreased considerably.

Perhaps this is the reason why Prime Minister Modi has to visit his home state repeatedly so that he can save his fortress.

In fact, after Narendra Modi went to Delhi from Gujarat, there was a vacancy in Gujarat BJP. At the same time, there is a lack of Modi in state-level governance too. After three years of becoming Prime Minister, the Chief Minister has changed twice in Gujarat. First Anandiben Patel and now Vijay Rupani.

In Gujarat recently, reservation movements of Patidar Samaj has played a big role in removing the Patidars from BJP. On the demand of reservation in jobs, Patidar Samaj has been agitating against the BJP government since year 2015.

The Narendra Modi government of the Center imposed the Notes ban and GST due to which India's economic growth rate declined. This has also reduced the popularity of BJP and PM Modi.

Many international agencies, including the World Bank, have feared the economy to slow down in the coming time too. Apart from this, due to unemployment and inflation, there has been a decrease in the popularity of the BJP government and the mass base.

Since Gujarat is a business-centric state, the direct impact of the economy's speed is on the public opinion.

Knowledgeable states that due to economic policies of the Modi government, traders of Gujarat have had to bear the losses. So, their trend can also shift from BJP to the Congress.

Apart from this, allegations of corruption against Jai Shah, son of BJP national president Amit Shah, can also damage BJP in the elections.

Due to the violence in Dalits in different parts of Gujarat in the last few years, it is natural for the Dalit society to be dissatisfied with the BJP. In Una and Vadodara large scale Dalits have already given their knocks.

Tribal society is also angry with the policies and actions of the BJP government, because so far they have not been benefitted from the 'Gujarat model' of development.

The tribal society, which has a fifth place according to the population in Gujarat, has been supporting BJP only.

Therefore, BJP has won 14 out of 27 reserved seats for Scheduled Tribes from the total 182 seats, but this time, the height of the Sardar Sarovar Dam, built on Narmada, is the highest tribal dominated village in the submerged area have come. They have not been properly displaced; this has indignation against the BJP in the tribal community. Because of this, it is believed that his trend could be on the Congress side.

For these reasons, the Congress, which is away from power for 22 years, is looking forward to a change in Gujarat. Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi is touring Gujrat several times to see Ahmed Patel's victory in the Rajya Sabha election, the Modi government, surrounded on falling economy, Dalit-tribals disillusionment with BJP. Similar to BJP, Congress has been using social media as a weapon. Congress is hoping to return to power by making religious, ethnic and other coalitions in Gujarat.

India is the third largest economy in Asia. In this economy e-commerce companies are still far from climbing profits.

Investors who invest millions of dollars in these companies are now pressuring good results, companies like Flipkart and Amazon are still aggressively spending a lot of money on advertising and attracting huge discounts to attract customers.

Amazon said that during the financial year 2015-16 it has suffered a loss of Rs 3,572 crore ($ 52.5 million) in India. This figure is double than last year.

The reason for this is also clear. Amazon has invested heavily in infrastructure and technology in India because India is second largest market for Amazon.

Nowadays the prevalence of e-commerce has increased greatly. Everyone is talking about this because investors have invested trillions of dollars in Amazon, Flipkart and Snapdeal, while this sector has not given any indication of earning profits so far in India. Everyone is anticipating that when will this sector be a profit maker?

Why is it that Amazon USA has made profits for eight consecutive quarters, but Amazon India has not given any indication of profit yet, while the parent company invested $ 2 billion in Amazon India.

This situation is because India's retail market is different in comparison to the US.

For decades, the United States is seen as a widely organized modern retail market. There are some leaders in every category of online business, which are quite occupied with market share.

Instead, the Indian retail market is operated by the Mom and Pop Store of 1 crore 20 lakhs family traders. This big difference can not be ignored.

America's modern retail marketing model is fairly large and spacious, with great stores on different floors of shopping malls, which cost more. There the owners of the shops have to spend a lot on the shop rent and other basic cost, maintenance of the list of online goods, and appointment of employees in every category for customer service. This list is quite long and the retailer has to make significant expenses other than the cost of the product before earning profits.

On the other hand, Amazon's spend on online model is very low because the products are kept in a highly automated warehouse, whose rent is much less than any good place. Apart from this, other expenses are also much lower. Consumers are solved online only if they have any complaint or question. Needless to say, Amazon's online business is relatively cheap compared to the physical retail market in the US and is therefore promoting better. The results are quite clear.

Now look at the scenario of India, which is exactly the opposite. In India, 90 per cent of family traders (mom and pop stores) occupy the retail market. These stores are operated by their owners themselves. They pay a lot less rent than the showroom in the mall. There are fewer employees in it. The salary of these employees is very low. These showrooms are used with very low margins. They contain fewer things and the goods are arranged when they are a customer. They have no online presence. They do not even have to work on digitizing and cataloging of online accessories. That's why their expenses are low and they work on very low margins.

Apart from this, there is an additional problem that according to government guidelines on FDI on multibrand retail, market place operator can not be seller. This means that they can not sell goods to purchase directly from sellers. They can only operate Market Place, which connects vendors to buyers.

So in the end a retailer or distributor sells goods on the online portal, but the current model of online commerce has increased significantly. There are several costs involved in picking up the product, keeping them in the warehouse, delivery, cash on delivery (COD) management and online and offline branding.

Who will fulfill these expenses? The capacity of the retail chain is not increasing with the existing online model, nor can any savings be made to fulfill these expenses. Venture Capital has to cover all the expenses and that is why continuous losses are being faced by online business even after decades of operation in India.

In short, it may be said that instead of adopting e-commerce models of the Western world and cutting and pasting, India needs to develop its own new e-commerce model, from which 1 crore 20 lakhs retailers benefit from it. Get a chance to pick up and reach the online buyers without spending much more.

We have to bridge the gap of the digital divide. It does not have to be extended. We need a model that can create more jobs and every participant on the retail industry has the opportunity to make profits. Only those few people should not get the benefit of this, who receive huge amounts of fund from international investors and who spend money in order to raise resources from their own interest.

Jai Shah, the son of Bharatiya Janata Party president Amit Shah, has been caught in controversy.

Turnover of his company Temple Enterprises Private Limited has increased 16 thousand times in 2015-16.

This increase took place when Narendra Modi's government was formed at the center and his father Amit Shah became the national president of BJP.

Earlier, Turnover of Temple Enterprises Private Limited was no.

According to 'The Wire', Jai Shah's company has an unsecured loan of Rs 15.78 crore, which has been made available by the KIFS Financial Services firm of Rajesh Khandwal, but surprisingly, the KIFS Financial Services this year the loan was given to Jai Shah's company, the total income of that year was Rs 7 crore.

Secondly, the document of ROC has revealed that there is no mention of unsecured loan of 15.78 rupees given to Temple Enterprises in the Annual Report of KIFS Financial Services.

Tell that Rajesh Khandhwal is the Rajya Sabha member of BJP and the top executive of Reliance Industries Parimal Nathwani's relatives.

In Jai Shah's company's balance sheets, it has been stated that till March 2013 and March 2014, there was no special function in the company and during this period the company had a loss of Rs 6,230 and Rs 1,724 respectively.

But as soon as Narendra Modi's government was formed in the center and his father became the national president of BJP, Jai Shah's company turned out to be astonishingly a turnover.

During the year 2014-15, his company earned a total of Rs 18,728 in total income of Rs 50,000. But during the financial year 2015-16, the turnover of Jai's company increased to 80.5 crore rupees. This is 16 thousand times more than 2014-15.

Jai Shah's lawyer told 'The Wire' that Rajesh Khandwal is an old friend of the Shah family. Apart from this, he has been seeing the functioning of share broking of Shah family for the last several years. Apart from this, his NBFC firm has been lending to the business of Jai Shah and Jitendra Shah for the past several years.

It has also been disclosed by the documents that in year 2015, Rajesh Khandwal and Jai Shah had jointly created the Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) of the name of Satva Tradelink, but it was closed soon.

On behalf of Jai Shah, his counsel told 'The Wire' that both of them had opened an LLP, but due to adverse conditions in the market there was no business in it. After this, it was closed and deleted from ROC's record.

ROC documents have also revealed that Jai's company has stated in its report that 95 percent of its income has come from the sale of agricultural products, while his company has neither the stock details nor the inventories. Apart from this there is no description of the movable and immovable property of his company.

Former Governor Yagya Venugopal Reddy of the Reserve Bank of India spoke better coalition governments for the economic growth of the country because in the last three decades, they have given India a better economic growth than the majority of the governments.

Reddy said, "It is interesting that the highest economic growth in India was between coalition governments between 1990 and 2014. In a way, on the basis of consensus, a coalition government in Indian conditions gives better economic results than any strong (full majority) government."

Referring to India's payment crisis in 1991, Reddy said, "The greatest achievement of that period was that despite the unstable political conditions, they made a common political consensus for those steps that were needed to be taken and its Successfully managed."

He was speaking at America's leading think tank Hudson Institute. Reddy was Governor of Reserve Bank from 2003 to 2008.

He said that the world economic crisis of 2008 is not yet to be over.

Reddy said, "Surely the situation has improved in the short term, but there are still question marks in the medium term."

He said that he sees significant changes in geopolitical conditions in the next 10 years. In the current process of globalization of capital, many governments believe that globalization has curbed their ability to make policies according to the expectations of the people.

Reddy said, "Now we are in search of a new balance between global and national, state and market, finance and non-finance. This quest continues."

He said that demographic and technological change in the next 10-15 years is also a matter of concern for environmental issues and these three topics are the biggest challenge before the global economy.

In response to a question, the former governor said that insolvency and refusal is a good step in the code of inability and everyone is convinced of it.

Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi has constituted the Council of Economic Advisers. This Council has included well-known economists whose work will be to the Prime Minister to give advice on economic matters.

The term of the previous Economic Advisory Council was terminated with the tenure of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had not formed this council after the formation of a new government.

Now, after about three and a half years, he has made a group of economists as their consultants.

The question arises as to what may be the reason that it was not initially formed. Why was this council designed by Modi now?

Professor DM Diwakar, economics professor at the NN Sinha Institute of Social Studies in Patna, told the BBC, "When the notes ban was announced, those who understand economics in the country and the world have rejected it.

At that time it seemed that such a mistake would have been made if Prime Minister Modi had good financial advice.

Today, when the economy is rolling down, in the way that GST was implemented without any preparation, it is suspected that due to this the economy will get rolled.

It is being estimated all around. Now if the economists' team has been prepared then it is too late.

The other thing is that in 2019 elections are going to take place. It will be a challenging task to get the economy back on a year and a half.

Today the entire business of the informal sector has settled down. Despite this, if the economist starts talking about it, then we have another fear.

The Governor of the Reserve Bank of India Raghuram Rajan and the Vice Chairman of the NITI Aayog Arvind Pangariya left their jobs, all have seen.

Based on the way Modi's work is done, there is no hope that some implementation will be made on economists' suggestions.

It would be good if new policies were made with thoughtful votes and any economic policy was ready.

In that if the basic principles of economics are kept in mind then the economy will not get worse.

The head of this council will be Bibek Debroy, also a member of the NITI Aayog. He had prepared a policy letter.

From that letter based on agriculture, it does not seem that they carry the Indian fundamentalist thinking of the economy together.

The way Bibek Debroy is running today, Bibek Debroy is the people in favor of corporate governance and will talk about big industries.

But the backbone of the Indian economy, in the direction of the unorganized sector businesses and industries, Bibek Debroy's thinking will not suit the economy right now.

As the Chairman (Bibek Debroy), if the other people have been kept to understand their point of view, then this council has no hope.

But due to the democratic process, the rest of the people will be heard, perhaps something will happen.

If it is the case with the basic principles of economics, then the way to get rid of the damage done so far can be found.

It is necessary that the debate between the group of economists in India is expedited.

Modi Government made the impression that nothing happened in 70 years. Based on this, the Planning Commission was abolished in the funeral.

There was at least one such thing in the Planning Commission that there was a sense of disagreement about ideas. The government also listened to the people standing in their protest on this forum.

Montek Singh Ahluwalia, deputy chairman of Planning Commission, used to print articles against his own government's policy.

After making of NITI Aayog, this aspect of the Planning Commission was over. Maybe the planning commission is not of any use. We understand everything or our people know everything or our political agenda is the final one.

Whatever may be the reason, the same can be said better.

But after the expiration of the term of the Planning Commission and the Economic Advisory Council which kind of form it was, it was a deliberate effort. Running according to your own and it was not in the country's interest.

Like the Planning Commission or like the Financial Advisory Committee, if they had a think tank, then they did not advise the notes ban.

Today the countries of the world are also surprised to see that the country which was walking with its highest growth rate after the global recession. Such a rollback was made after the notes ban, and after that GST was implemented in such a hurry, the consequences are terrifying.

The Modi government has reviewed and especially for young people. Worry is also that if the growth rate is going down fast, then where will the expenses of the government come from?

However, for this, they have put together the expenses of plan and non plan, so that they do not know that what is the cost of development and what about maintenance? ''

The dam of Ganga Pump Canal scheme at Bateshwar Sthan in Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur in Bihar, was broken 15 hours before the ingauration.

On Wednesday, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar was about to inaugurate the Bateshwar Sthan Ganga Pump Canal Project, which was completed about 40 years in Kahalgaon in Bhagalpur district.

On Tuesday, advertisements related to this opening ceremony were published in many newspapers published in Patna. The program has been postponed after the canal project breaks down.

Former Deputy Chief Minister of Bihar, Tejasvi Yadav, is targeting Nitish Kumar by tweeting after this incident. In a tweet he said, "The water resources department is a haunt of corruption. Why do the CM remain silent on the corruption of this department?

In another tweet, he taunted, "Tell Nitish ji, what the project costing Rs 828 crores has also been eaten by the rats, which the dam broke? Its sehra should also be tied to the rats.''

Tejasvi Yadav commented on Nitish in another tweet,'' What will be big administrative failure for CM Nitish that for a few hours before inauguration, the dam of rupees 828 crores already flows corruption in the Ganges."

For the breaking of the dam, Congress MLA Sadanand Singh has described the gross negligence of engineers and contractors as responsible.

RJD activists have described the live example of corruption in building this canal. And on Wednesday sat on a day-long protest to demand a probe against it.

The Congress legislator taunted that where Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's zero tolerance went on corruption?

RJD MLA Ram Vilas Paswan of Pirepanthi has described the collusion of engineers and contractors for the incident as responsible.

On Wednesday morning, at 10 o'clock, for 40 years, the canal was awaiting a desirable opening. On Tuesday evening, as the trial the pump was started and the water was left in the canal, the wall of the dam constructed near NTPC was broken by about six feet and the flow of water was so fast that seeing CISF colony's 150 meter wall was swept away.

Water entered the quarters of people and the surrounding area became submerged.

On Tuesday, the canal's water went into the residence of the civil judge and sub-judge of Kahalgaon along with NTPC township.

Water entered Akbarpur and Rani Lagaria villages. On the other hand, the route to Kahalgaon's Satkar Chowk and Muraktiya Chowk was also submerged in water.

In the night, DM Aadesh Titmare and SSP Manoj Kumar reached the spot. The team of SDRF was engaged in rescue work. Close the canal pump.

According to the information, the water has almost come out from the area, but some roads have got silt (soil) deposited.

Principal Secretary Water Resources Arun Kumar Singh said in the afternoon on Wednesday on phone that there is no need to create a probe committee in this regard nor action has been taken against anyone. After going to Patna, advice will be given at the point of action. This situation was born because of making the wrong calvert near the canal. The repair has been instructed.

Within two months, the principal secretary has been relied on to correct all the flaws and leakage of the project. The Calvert NTPC built near the bridge was built in 1994-95 without which the NOC was started.

While the executive director of Kahalgaon NTPC, Rakesh Samuil, told the reporters that the NOC was only going to start the over bridge with reporters.

Within two months, Principal Secretary has given the confidence to repair all the flaws and leakage of the project. The Calvert was built by NTPC near the bridge in 1994-95 which was started without the NOC.

While the executive director of Kahalgaon NTPC, Rakesh Saumual, told the reporters that the over bridge was started after taking the NOC.

Surprisingly, how did the state government engineers and officers ignore such a weak Calvert? Besides, why was the trial itself only on the eve of inauguration? The answers to these questions are yet to come.

Even before the date of inauguration of this project has been postponed on July 7, 11 and 19.

Now the wall of the dam is broken.

Looking at the situation, it will take some more time to repair the canal dam.

The Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project was conceived by India's first Home Minister, Sardar Patel. Later, the first Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation of the Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project.

But PM Modi took the name of Sardar Patel in his address, but forgot to take the name of Jawaharlal Nehru, the first PM of India, who laid the foundation of Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project.

The question arises as to whether this happened in ignorance with Modi? The truth is that Modi has been saying for the last several years that the Congress government has not done any work in 60 years! Prime Minister Narendra Modi will now take the name of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru from which mouth while opening the Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project.

Indeed, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not done any work in his 3 years rule.

So far, the Jawahar Tunnel project in Kashmir (project of the Manmohan Singh government of Congress), the world's longest river bridge on the Brahmaputra river (project of Manmohan Singh government of Congress), Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project (project of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru Government of Congress ) including Modi has launched many projects. All projects are of the Congress government.

If asked in the language of RSS and BJP, Modi has done the job of only photographed.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India inaugurated today's ambitious project of Sardar Sarovar Narmada Dam on the Narmada River and mentioned all the obstacles in this project in the last seven decades and hoped that this project will create 100 crore Indians in the form of new India will work for inspiration.

Addressing a rally here after inaugurating the dam project, Modi said that several sides including the World Bank created obstacles in the path of Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project.

He said that he has a raw blog of every man, due to which delay in the dam project.

He said that there was a time when the World Bank refused to give loans for this project.

He said that he is grateful to the two people for this project- Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel and Baba Saheb Ambedkar.

But forgot to take the name of Jawaharlal Nehru, the first PM of India, who laid the foundations of Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project.

He said, "Wherever the spirit of the Iron Man of India will be anywhere today, he will be blessing many blessings on us."

He said that Sardar Patel had envisaged a dam on Narmada in view of irrigation and water crisis in this Gujarat region like a divine sight.

Modi said that Baba Saheb Ambedkar had envisaged all plans for the development of the country while staying in the Council of Ministers.

He said that if these two great men lived for a long time, then the country would get more benefit from their talent.

Referring to the Narmada Dam, he said that this dam would be a very important topic for modern engineering experts, as well as it would be a symbol of strength of the country.

He said that environmentalists and some others had opposed it. Also, the World Bank had refused to fund the project.

He said that this dam project will change the fate of millions of farmers of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra.

Referring to the delay in the Narmada dam project, the Prime Minister said that he is not linking it with politics otherwise he has a raw piece of people who created obstacles and made a conspiracy in this project.

The Prime Minister also said that after the governments that respected the Narmada river, there was a lot of speed in the work of this project and the rest of the time did not work too fast for this project.

It is notable that Narendra Modi had also made a hunger strike for the Narmada dam during the chief minister of Gujarat.

Earlier, Prime Minister Modi released the Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project. The height of this dam has been increased to 138.68 meters.

The Sardar Sarovar Narmada dam project was conceived in 1946 by Sardar Patel, India's first home minister. Later, the first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru laid the foundation for this project.

Since then, the work of this project has been going on for seven consecutive decades. The water from this dam project and the electricity produced here will benefit from four states- Gujarat, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan.

India's current account deficit has risen to the highest level of four years due to increasing trade deficit in PM Narendra Modi's reign in India.

In the first quarter of the financial year 2017-18, it grew rapidly to $ 14.3 billion.

This is 2.4 percent of GDP.

The current account deficit (CAD) was $ 0.4 billion or 0.1 percent of GDP in the same quarter of fiscal year 2016-17. It was 3.4 billion dollar (0.6 percent of GDP) in the quarter ended March 2017.

According to the Reserve Bank, "The main reason for the increase in the current account deficit on a yearly basis is to increase the trade deficit. Due to the increase in imports, it was $ 41.2 billion."

Normally, the current account deficit tells the difference in foreign exchange flows and withdrawals.

India's exports grew by 10.29 percent to $ 23.81 billion in August. This is the highest increase in the last four months.

According to official data, the increase in total export of petroleum products, engineering and chemical exports has increased.

According to the data released by the commerce ministry, imports in August increased by 21.02 percent to $ 35.46 billion, compared to $ 29.3 billion in the same month a year ago. Trade deficit increased to $ 11.64 billion in the month under review.

Increasing import of gold has mainly led to increased trade deficits.

Gold imports in August increased by 69 percent to $ 1.88 billion.

Oil imports in August also increased by 14.22 percent to $ 7.75 billion. During the April-August period, the total exports increased 8.57 percent to $ 118.57 billion, while imports increased by 26.63 percent to $ 181.71 billion. The trade deficit increased to 63.14 billion dollars.