Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi on Wednesday performed Bhumi Pujan for the construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya and then laid the foundation stone of the temple.
This has been a contentious issue in India. Therefore, due to the beginning of the construction of the temple and especially by the Prime Minister himself being involved in the program, the foundation of the temple is being discussed abroad.
How does the media of India's neighboring countries see this whole development? Let's have a look at this.
Bangladesh
A two-language website from Bangladesh, bdnews24.com, has given the news a place in the 'spotlight' and said that the temple is being built where a mosque was demolished three decades ago, following which communal riots across the country Were beginning to happen.
The report given on the front page states that "Modi and his nationalist political party have fulfilled their very old promises with this, as well as the first anniversary of their government's fulfillment of the second promise." - To end the special status of the only Muslim-majority province of India.''
The most read stories on the site include the story of Iqbal Ansari, an advocate of the Babri Masjid, and Mohammed Sharif, an Ayodhya resident, invited to attend the event. This report states that both the Muslim eyewitnesses of the 1992 riots are joining the program which is a 'sign of reconciliation' from them.
One of the biggest English newspapers in Bangladesh, the 'Daily Star', while mentioning the news in its 'World' page, has mentioned the decision of the Indian Supreme Court last year, saying, "It was a great victory for BJP though It was, but according to critics, this was another step taken to convert secular India into a Hindu nation, which is part of Modi's agenda.''
The Dhaka Tribune has a different report on Ayodhya titled - Why would a Hindu deity be shown in Times Square on Wednesday?
It has been told in the news firstly that why the issue is so controversial?
It has been said that many people are calling this whole issue a part of 'Hindu fascism' and in the wake of the protest many sponsor companies have retreated although Disney and Clear Channel are part of the outdoor program.
The second page in the international page says that although one of his ministers has got Covid-19, the Prime Minister is going to Ayodhya to attend the program.
Another English newspaper 'The Observer' has also given it a place in its international news.
Nepal
Nepal's newspaper 'The Himalayan' has made headline the part of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech in Ayodhya on Wednesday which said - 'The wait for centuries is over'.
It has been said in the news that a lot of Muslims of Ayodhya have welcomed the construction of the temple, in the hope that after this the stigma between Hindu-Muslims will be eliminated and after that the work of economic progress will be done in the city.
But the newspaper has said that an influential Muslim organization has opposed the construction of the temple, which it has described as unfair, and repressive, shameful and enticing the majority.
The newspaper has cited the statement of All India Muslim Personal Law Board for this.
Kantipur, a Nepali-language newspaper published in many places, has said that the construction work at the Ram temple, which has been a major issue in Indian politics for decades, started on Wednesday.
Kantipur states that although the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party has been raising the construction of the Ram temple as a political issue for the last three decades, the BJP and Hinduist organizations are giving ideological and political victory to the foundation laying program.
The prestigious website 'Himal' says that the event has been held in Ayodhya but Nepal needs to be vigilant so that there is no communal riot, nor should politics and religion be integrated here like India.
In his article, well-known journalist Kanakamani Dixit has said that when religion and politics are mixed together, it creates a disintegration in the society.
Pakistan
Pakistan's English newspaper 'The Dawn' in its report, without naming the eminent Indian Muslims, has said that the community has succumbed to this new truth but fears that the Hindu north who belongs to its nationalist views Will target other mosques of the state.
Another English newspaper, The Daily Times, has said in the headline that Pakistan has condemned the temple being built on the site of the demolished Babri Masjid.
It has been said that with the rise of majoritarianism in India, Muslims are feeling insecure and their rights are constantly under attack.
Ram is justice, Ram can never appear in injustice: Rahul Gandhi
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said that Lord Ram is love, compassion and justice. On Wednesday morning, he tweeted that Ram can never appear in injustice.
Rahul Gandhi tweeted - Maryada Purushottam Lord Ram is the manifestation of the best human qualities. They are the core of humanity in the depths of our mind.
Ram is love
They can never appear in disgust
Ram is compassion
They can never appear cruel
Ram is justice
They can never appear in injustice.
Stain on the face of democracy: Pakistan
Pakistan's Foreign Ministry has issued a statement condemning the Ram temple Bhoomipujan.
The Pakistani Foreign Ministry said in its statement, "The land on which the historic Babri Masjid stood for nearly 500 years, Pakistan strongly condemns the beginning of the construction of 'Ram Temple' there." The decision of the Supreme Court of India to build the temple has not only reflected the growing majoritarianism in the current India, but also the dominance of religion over justice. In today's India, the shrines of minority, especially Muslims, are constantly being targeted. The temple built on the land of the historic mosque will be like a speck on the face of so-called Indian democracy. ''
PM breaks his own oath: Owaisi
Lok Sabha MP from Hyderabad and AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has violated his own oath today by laying the foundation stone of Ram temple.
He said, "Today is the day for the defeat of democracy and the victory of Hindutva." The Prime Minister said that he is passionate today. Prime Minister, today I am also emotional because I believe in equality of citizens and living with everybody. I am passionate because there was a mosque there for 450 years. ''
On Wednesday morning, Auwaisi tweeted and said, "Babri Masjid Tha, Hai Aur Rahegi Inshallah!" He also used #BabriZindaHai in his tweet.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board, an organization of Muslims, had issued a press release a day earlier and said that Babri Masjid will always be a mosque.
Tweeting this statement, the Muslim Personal Law Board wrote, "Hagia Sophia is a great example for us. It is unjust, oppressive, shameful to take possession of the land and its status cannot be changed by the verdict of the majority. No need to break your heart. Conditions are not the same forever. ''
CPM raised questions
The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) questioned India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's involvement in the Bhoomipujan program.
The party tweeted from its official Twitter handle, "Respect the constitutional spirit of keeping the state separate from religion." The Constitution of India is firm in that there should not be a mixture of religion and politics. Then why is the Prime Minister of India and the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh trying to reap political benefits from the Bhumi Pujan ceremony of a temple? ''
Lok Sabha MP and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi has said that Babri Masjid was and will remain. Following the Supreme Court's decision in November last year, Bhoomi Puja is being organized for the Ram temple in Ayodhya on Wednesday.
Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath are also attending this event. While many leaders and MPs are welcoming Bhumi Puja, there are voices of protest from many circles.
On Wednesday morning, Owaisi tweeted and said - Babri Masjid was, is and will remain inshaAllah. He also used #BabriZindaHai in his tweet.
At the same time, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board issued a press release a day earlier and said that Babri Masjid will always be a mosque. Tweeting this statement, the Muslim Personal Law Board has written - Hagia Sophia is a great example for us. It is unjust, oppressive, shameful to take possession of the land and its status cannot be changed by the verdict of the majority. No need to break your heart. Conditions do not last forever.
However, there has also been criticism on social media from the All India Muslim Personal Law Board for comparing the Babri Masjid with Hagia Sophia. People are also calling the board's statement a contempt of the Supreme Court.
A few days ago, Turkish President Rechep Tayyip Ardoआनan announced the conversion of the historic Hagia Sophia into a mosque in Istanbul.
The Hagia Sophia was built nearly 1,500 years ago as a Christian church and in 1453 the Ottoman Empire, which converted to Islam, converted it into a mosque after the conquest.
The Hagia Sophia was converted from a mosque to a museum in 1934 after Mustafa Kamal Pasha, the creator of modern Turkey, declared the country secular.
The decision of the Supreme Court of India
After the verdict in the Ayodhya case, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board filed a review petition in the Supreme Court. Which was rejected by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court had directed the central government to give five acres of land for the construction of the mosque in Ayodhya.
However the Muslim Personal Law Board had said that it would not accept a separate land for the mosque in Ayodhya.
The Babri Masjid was demolished on 6 December 1992. After this, communal violence broke out in many places in the country and around 2000 people were killed. People associated with the Ram temple movement in Ayodhya claimed that the Babri Masjid was built by demolishing the Ram temple and it was here that Rama was born.
In November last year, a five-member bench headed by the then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Ranjan Gogoi decided to give land to Ramlala. The Supreme Court had directed the government to constitute a trust for the construction of Ram temple. Also ordered five acres of land for the mosque elsewhere in Ayodhya.
Meanwhile, CPI-ML has said to celebrate the protest day on August 5. The party has issued a statement saying that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is using a religious ceremony as a political platform. The party says that doing so in place of the demolition of Babri Masjid is a crime.
There has been a major explosion in Lebanon's capital, Beirut.
The Lebanese Health Minister has said that at least 70 people have been confirmed dead and about 4000 have been injured. Lebanon Prime Minister Hassan Diab has announced National Mourning Day on Wednesday.
Officials say that there was a huge explosive material store in a warehouse and there was a blast.
Lebanese President Michael Eoin has tweeted that it is absolutely unacceptable that 2,750 tons of explosive nitrate were stored unsafely. How did the explosion happen? It is still under investigation.
A BBC journalist present on the occasion says that the bodies are scattered and heavy damage has been done. Lebanese Prime Minister Hassan Diab described it as horrifying and said that those who are guilty will not be released.
The explosive nitrate store that is being talked about was a store since 2014. An eyewitness from the news agency AFP said that all the surrounding buildings have collapsed. Mirrors and debris are scattered all around. The sound of the blast was heard in the eastern Mediterranean to Cyprus, 240 kilometers away.
The explosion occurred just before the 2005 Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri's investigation and court hearing.
The blast took place in the city's coastal area. Explosion scenes in videos posted online are horrific. Flames of smoke are rising with flames.
The explosion has taken place when Lebanon is badly engulfed in economic crisis. Lebanese Health Minister Hamad Hasan has said that many people have been injured in the blast and heavy damage has been done.
It is being said that a large number of casualties have been taken to hospitals.
The cause of the blast has not been known yet. It is also seen as an accident in some reports. The Lebanese National News Agency reports that an explosive center on the coastline has been set on fire.
It is being shown in the local media that people are buried under the rubble. An eyewitness said that the first blast was deaf.
Lebanon is also under tension with Israel on the outskirts. Israel said last week that it thwarted Hizbullah's attempts to infiltrate its territory.
However, a senior Israeli official from the BBC said that Israel had nothing to do with the Beirut blast.
Protests against the government have been taking place in Lebanon for some time. Lebanon is facing the biggest economic crisis since the civil war of 1975–1990 and people are on the streets against the government.
The Indian Embassy in Lebanon has issued a helpline detailing the horrific explosion.
The Indian Embassy tweeted, "There are two big blasts in Central Beirut this evening." Everyone is advised to maintain restraint. If anyone in the Indian community needs help, you can contact our helpline. ”
An eyewitness named Hadi Nasrullah told the BBC-
I saw the flames but I didn't know that the explosion was going to happen. I went inside. Suddenly I stopped hearing because I was very close to the scene. I did not hear anything for a few seconds. I started to feel that something was wrong.
Suddenly, glass and glass started falling on vehicles, shops and buildings. People were calling each other from different areas throughout Beirut. Everyone heard the sound of the explosion. We were absolutely speechless because if there was a blast earlier, only one area was affected, but it was a blast that was felt outside of Beirut.
What does BBC Arab affairs analyst Sebastian Usher say?
The photos and videos that have surfaced after the blast include not only smoke balloons but also several kilometers of destruction. The explosion has shocked Lebanon already troubled by the economic crisis. The Lebanese economy has collapsed and people are protesting against the government on the streets.
Just before the blast, there was a scuffle between the anti-government protesters and the police outside the Energy Ministry. People are demanding to fix the accountability of the leaders. Even starvation warnings and communal conflicts are expected to increase. The blast also reminded many of Rafiq Hariri's death. The people of Lebanon are hoping that this time it is just an accident, not a premeditated conspiracy.
What is the Hariri matter?
Former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was assassinated in 2005 through a car bomb. A United Nations tribunal is scheduled to announce its verdict in the murder case on Friday. All four suspects belong to the Iran-backed Hezbollah group.
However, they have been denying involvement in this attack. There is also talk of another blast outside Hariri's residence.
The four suspects are Shia Muslims and have a court hearing against them in the Netherlands. When Hariri was killed by a car bomb, 21 other people were also killed in it.
On 14 February 2005, while Rafiq Hariri was going by a car, there was a big blast targeting him. He was killed in the blast.
Hariri was the leading Sunni leader of Lebanon. He had come with the opposition before the assassination. Hariri also supported the demand to withdraw the Syrian army from Lebanon, which had been present since the civil war in Lebanon in 1976.
Thousands of people descended on the streets to protest against the pro-Syrian government after Hariri's assassination. A powerful neighbor was held responsible by Lebanon for Hariri's murder. Within two weeks of the attack, the government had to resign and after some time Syria also had to withdraw its army.
After collecting all the evidence, the United Nations and Lebanon set up a tribunal in The Hague in 2007 to investigate the explosion. The tribunal framed charges of terrorism, murder and attempted murder on four Iran-backed Hezbollah suspects.
Mustafa Amin, a fifth man associated with the attack and Hizbullah's military commander, was assassinated in Syria in 2016.
Hezbollah's supporters have dismissed the trial. He says the tribunal is not politically neutral.
The Pakistani cabinet has approved a new political map of Pakistan showing Jammu and Kashmir-Ladakh-Junagadh as part of Pakistan.
Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, while giving himself information on Tuesday, said that the decision of the cabinet has been welcomed by all opposition parties and Kashmiri (Kashmir of Pakistan) leadership.
Imran Khan said that 'the new political map of Pakistan represents the aspirations of the people of Pakistan. Supports the ideological ideology of the people of Pakistan and Kashmir.'
On this occasion, Imran Khan further said, "The political plan that India took in Kashmir on August 5 last year, denies it."
Imran Khan said that from now on Pakistan's schools, colleges and all offices will have the same official map of Pakistan which has been approved by the Pakistani cabinet on Tuesday.
India's response
India rejected this new political map of Pakistan and said that it has neither legal validity nor any credibility internationally.
The Indian Foreign Ministry issued a statement saying, "We have seen the so-called" political map of Pakistan "which has been released by Prime Minister Imran Khan. It is a baseless claim to the Indian state of Gujarat and the territory of our union territories Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, a step taken in political stupidity. These ridiculous claims have neither legal validity nor international credibility. The truth is that this new attempt by Pakistan only confirms the genuineness of Pakistan's passion for expansion of territory supported by cross-border terrorism.
On this occasion, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mehmadu Qureshi said that the administrative map of Pakistan has been coming earlier (1949, 1976) but for the first time there has been a political map which used to be called Pakistanis in closed rooms, now it is called this map. They are telling the whole world where Pakistan stands.
Sir Creek and Siachen also claimed
Shah Mahmood Qureshi said that in August last year, India released a map showing Pakistan's Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan as part of India. Qureshi said that this step of India is completely against the bans of the UN Security Council.
Qureshi said that Pakistan believes that this entire area is disputed, the solution is being sought.
Qureshi said, "The solution will be found in accordance with the wishes of the Kashmiri and Pakistani people and the resolutions of the UN Security Council, which India has promised." There will be a referendum under the supervision of the United Nations which will decide what the future of Kashmir will be. ''
Pakistan Foreign Minister said that through this map Pakistan has rejected India's claims on Siachen Glacier and Sir Creek as well.
Qureshi said that this new political map of Pakistan gives a clear message to India and Kashmir that the Pakistani community was with the Kashmiris yesterday and is still with them today.
One year after the abolition of Section 370
India abolished the status of a special state to be given to Indian Kashmir under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution on August 5 last year (2019).
Apart from this, the state of Jammu and Kashmir was also abolished and converted into two union territories Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.
On the completion of one year of this decision of India, Pakistan has organized many special programs to show their support to the people of Indian Kashmir.
Issuing a new map of Pakistan is also a part of that.
While presenting the new map on Tuesday, Imran Khan said that Kashmir has only one solution, to accept the UN resolutions.
Imran Khan said, "The UN resolution gives the people of Kashmir the right to decide through a vote whether they want to go with Pakistan or stay with Hindustan." This right was given to him by the international fraternity which he has not received till date.
Imran Khan said that he does not believe in military solution and only political solution to Kashmir problem is possible. He said that this plan is the first step and his political struggle for the Kashmiris will continue.
Does the constitution of Pakistan approve it?
Hassan Abbas, an official of the Pakistan State Department, explained this new map, "Pakistan's new political map released through Imran Khan, Pakistan's Kashmir (Pakistan called Azad Kashmir), Gilgit-Baltistan, Junagadh, Sir. The Creek and the area after NJ9842 (Siachen) is considered as part of Pakistan, while the part of India is Jammu and Kashmir disputed area and has to be resolved according to UN Security Council resolutions.
On Wednesday, August 5, a march will be taken across Pakistan to show support from the people of Indian Kashmir, which will be led by President Arif Alvi. A minute of silence will also be kept in Pakistan tomorrow.
Imran Khan will join the march in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Kashmir, Pakistan and then address the House there.
India has now opened its doors to foreign universities under the new education policy. Reputed universities of the world will now be able to open their campuses in India.
Although according to experts, it cannot be said whether these changes will be able to get on the ground soon or not, but many feel that the opening of the top 200 foreign universities in India will also increase the level of higher education here. Many people also believe that this will also help in preventing talent migration.
The Modi government's current stand on bringing foreign universities to India is in stark contrast to the BJP's earlier stand on the Regulation of Entry and Operation Bill 2010 brought by the UPA-2 government on foreign educational institutions.
The ruling party of PM Modi, including the Left leaders of India, has also been opposing the earlier governments' attempts to allow foreign universities into India.
But many government officials insisted on taking these steps, because every year more than seven and a half million Indian students spend billions of dollars studying abroad.
On Wednesday, Higher Education Secretary Amit Khare told reporters that the government will give the world's highest ranked universities the opportunity to open their campuses in India.
However, critics of this decision also say that why would the highest class universities want to open their campus in India? When the Government of India has set the maximum fees under its new education policy. That is, now universities will not be able to raise the required amount. Also, under the new education policy, higher education institutions will have to bring more transparency in the matter of charging fees.
The US dollar witnessed a sharp decline on Wednesday amid the Corona crisis. The US dollar is said to be at its lowest level in the last two years.
At the same time, pressure has been increased on the Central Banking System of the US 'Federal Reserve' to take necessary steps such as reduction in interest rates to prevent the decline.
Although the market expects the government to remain calm for the moment, some analysts speculate that the 'Federal Reserve' may take some far-reaching steps, given the way the Corona infection in the US and the tense environment is growing.
Derek Halpenny, head of research at MUFG Bank, one of Japan's largest banks, told news agency Reuters, "These things mean that we should expect more dismal conditions of economic growth." We should also focus on the US dollar to some extent.
The US dollar fell 0.4 percent against other currencies this Wednesday. This is the lowest level of US dollar since June 2018.
The US dollar has weakened 3% since the last meeting of the 'Federal Reserve'. US consumer confidence has weakened more than expected in July.
This indicates that people are reducing expenses due to increasing cases of corona infection.
"Given the concerns of the second wave of transition, the market feels that the Federal Reserve will decide to reduce interest rates," says Yujiro Goto, market expert at Nomura Security.
Russia has said that the satellite test it did in space was not a weapon.
Russia's defense ministry dismissed the accusations of the US and Britain, accusing them of manipulating the facts.
The Russian Defense Ministry issued a statement saying, "The tests conducted on July 15 have not posed any threat to any other spacecraft. And it has not violated any international law.''
Russia said that it is using new technology to monitor and test Russia's space equipment.
Earlier Britain and America had said that they are worried about these activities of Russia.
Britain and the US had alleged that Russia launched something like a weapon from a satellite in space.
The head of Britain's space directorate issued a statement saying, "We are concerned about the way Russia has tested one of its satellites by launching something like a weapon."
The statement said that such action is a threat to the peaceful use of space.
The US had earlier expressed concern about Russia's satellite.
Air Marshal Harvey Smith, head of Britain's Space Directorate, issued a statement saying, "This type of action poses a threat to the peaceful use of space and it also poses the risk of debris accumulating in space that is the satellite and the entire space Can damage the system on which the whole world depends.''
He said, "We urge Russia to abstain from such tests further." We also urge Russia to continue to work constructively with Britain and other allies to promote responsible attitude in space.''
According to BBC Defense Correspondent Jonathan Bell, Britain has first accused Russia of carrying out satellite tests in space, and this happened just a few days after the Intelligence and Security Committee in Britain said in a report that Britain The government had failed miserably to address the threat from Russia.
Fear of space war?
After this incident, a new type of arms race in space can give rise to concern and many other countries are also investigating the technology which can be used as a weapon in space.
The US has said that it is the same satellite system of Russia about which it had expressed concern in the year 2018 and also questioned this year when the US accused Russia of having a satellite close to the US satellite. having had.
Regarding this latest development, the head of the US Space Command, General J. Raymond, said that there is evidence that Russia has tested an anti-satellite weapon in space.
General Raymond said that Russia has launched a new thing in Orbit via satellite.
He said, "This is another proof of Russia's constant efforts to develop and test space-based systems. And this is in line with Russia's public military doctrine of the use of weapons to put the US and its allies in space at risk.''
How many Nepali migrant people are working in India and how many Indian diaspora are working in Nepal at this time?
It is not easy to answer both these questions accurately. Because India and Nepal are bound in a centuries-old relationship, and especially because of the 1950 Peace and Friendship Treaty, people in both countries have been moving without any hindrance.
There is no data on the movement of people and therefore neither India nor Nepal has the right answer to both the above questions.
In such a situation, it became difficult for the Government of Nepal when the Supreme Court of Nepal issued a notice on 10 July asking him why Nepali workers working in India should not be given all the facilities and security, which other Nepali workers working in countries get.
The court has asked the government of Nepal to reply to the notice within 15 days.
The government of Nepal has allowed its citizens to live and work in 170 countries of the world. In recent years, Nepal has signed labor agreements with several countries.
Nepal has also created a Foreign Employment Fund, under which compensation is paid to the families of Nepali nationals working abroad when they are injured or killed.
The Nepalese government also issues foreign employment permits to its workers, through which a worker can insure up to 15 lakh Nepalese rupees.
But all these laws and facilities do not apply to those workers of Nepal who work in India or who are Indian citizens who work in Nepal.
In both countries, such workers are not well known. This has led to the apprehension that these migrant workers will not get safe migration or adequate financial compensation if needed.
Nirmal Kumar Upreti, one of the petitioners in the Supreme Court of Nepal, says that the neglect of the interests of Nepali workers working in India through the Nepalese government is an open violation of Nepal's foreign employment law.
According to Upreti, it is also a violation of the right to protect Nepali migrant workers.
According to the BBC, he said, "For Nepalese migrant workers, India is a foreign country like other countries." But due to no documentation of being a foreign laborer, these Nepali citizens are deprived of any compensation or facilities that Nepali workers working in other countries get. ''
According to Nepalese officials, about 50 lakh Nepalese people work abroad and send money from abroad for the expenses of their family living in Nepal.
During the financial year 2018-19, Nepalese citizens living abroad sent eight billion eight million US dollars to Nepal only through official sources.
It is difficult to tell how much money came to Nepal from unofficial channels like Hundi and Hawala during this time.
According to an assessment made by the World Bank in 2018, Nepalese workers working in India sent more than one billion US dollars in Nepal in a year, while Indian workers working in Nepal at the same time had about one billion 50 One million US dollars was sent to India. In this way, Nepal is a major source of cash flows (remittances) coming to India.
Now you can guess how many Nepalis are working in India and how many Indians are working in Nepal.
According to the 2019 report of the International Organization of Migration (IOM), around 30 to 40 lakh Nepalese workers live and work in India. However, Indian officials estimate that this number is much more than this.
According to the IOM, the number of Indians working in Nepal is around 5-7 lakhs.
Dr. Ganesh Gurung, a former member of Nepal's National Planning Commission and an in-depth study on Nepali workers working abroad, says, "The border is open and the workers have complete freedom of movement, so it is very difficult to tell the exact number . Many workers crossing the Indo-Nepal border visit each other only during special seasons. For example, Nepali laborers living in the Terai-Madhes region visit Punjab and Haryana at harvest time and many laborers from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh visit Nepal during this period. Many laborers of Nepal go to India to work in special weather."
While the freedom of movement on the Indo-Nepal border has many benefits, it also has some harmful aspects.
People aware of the pitiable condition of such unsafe and unregistered workers say that because of working in the unorganized sector, they are always at risk that they can be injured, abused and They can be exploited, but they have no way to avoid them.
Balakrishna Pandey, chairman of the Nepali Public Relations Committee and Friendship India, an organization that helps Nepalis living and working in India, says thinking about measures to protect Nepali workers is an issue that has been ignored for decades.
Balkrishna Pandey moved to India from Nepal at the age of 17. "He says, since 1990, I have been raising the issue that the poor laborers coming to India from Nepal need to be given some kind of registration and protection." Many Prime Ministers have visited. Many Nepalese leaders stayed here with migrant workers when they came to India, but when they came to power, the migrant Nepalis forgot. ''
According to Pandey, nearly six lakh Nepalese migrant workers have migrated from India to Nepal since the outbreak of the Corona epidemic. These include some Nepali women trapped in Manipur who were being trafficked from India to the Gulf countries, but were rescued with the help of a non-governmental organization.
Nepal's workers have been coming to India for centuries through the Indo-Nepal 1880 km border. Nepali officials say they are aware of the troubles of Nepali workers, they also know that Nepali women and children are trafficked.
Suman Ghimire, spokesman for Nepal's Ministry of Labor and Social Security, says that he and his colleagues are always discussing the safety of Nepalese migrant workers.
He says, "After the Corona epidemic, Nepal's local bodies have started registering all the people coming to India from Nepal. This is the first step in protecting the Nepali migrant laborers working in India. We need to do more and we are serious about it. ''
Welcoming the steps being taken to improve the situation of Nepal's migrants, Dr. Ganesh Gurung, a former member of the Nepal Planning Commission, says, "Extremely those who cross the Indo-Nepal border to work or do seasonal work Are poor people They are always at risk, they should be protected at all costs. ''
After the coming of Narendra Modi's government in India, many efforts were made to improve the relationship between the two countries, including the movement of workers.
The Committee Eminent Persons Group (EPG), formed in 2016 to review the 1950 peace treaty, made several suggestions about the movement of people across the border. After several meetings, the committee has completed its report but neither government has accepted the report of the committee yet.
Experts say that the EPG report can be an essential basis on which measures can be suggested to improve and protect the rules of migrant workers of both countries.
During the year 2009-10 when Dr. Ganesh Gurung was a member of the Planning Commission, he made some proposals for the protection of the workers going to India but according to him, "My proposals created a ruckus in the Planning Commission. In the three-year plan It was somehow included but no action was taken on the ground.
Welcoming the Supreme Court's decision of 10 July, he says, "This is the best time to start reforms".
Suresh Raj, a Delhi-based Nepali journalist, says that both countries should take immediate steps to protect their migrant workers, register them and issue them a certificate.
Suresh Raj says, "Who is crossing the border once the officials start registering it will then make it a little easier for the officials of the Nepalese Embassy in Delhi to ensure the safety of Nepali workers working in India."
But a Nepalese embassy official says that both countries will have to work very carefully.
He says, "If we start issuing foreign employment permits to our workers, who have been crossing the border without interruption for centuries, it will affect the relations between India and Nepal." We need to be very careful. But regular and controlled migration of workers is very important.
Given such labor relations between India and Nepal, it is difficult to say how and what will the Government of Nepal respond to the notice of the Supreme Court in a few days?
A telephonic conversation between India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi took place on Sunday amid efforts to restore peace on both sides following violent clashes in the Galvani Valley between India and China.
The details of the talks between India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi have been issued by the Chinese Embassy in India.
In his statement, Chinese Ambassador to India Sun Waidong has given details of the interaction between the two Special Representatives. He has said that the Chinese Foreign Minister told Ajit Doval that the relationship between India and China is 70 years old.
According to the Chinese Foreign Minister, what has happened in the Galvan Valley on the western sector border between India and China, it is clear what is right and what has gone wrong.
The Chinese Foreign Minister also said that China wants to protect its sovereignty as well as restore peace in the area.
Wang Yi also stressed in his talk that development is the top priority of both China and India, so both countries should focus on reducing tensions.
According to the Chinese ambassador, there was a detailed discussion between the two representatives. In this conversation, broadly agreed on four things -
- The consensus between the top leaders of the two countries will be implemented. The two leaders have agreed to work together for a long time for peace and development in the border areas.
- The two countries will jointly try to reduce the tension on the border according to mutual agreement.
- Through dialogue between special representatives, both sides will improve mutual dialogue. The system of working mechanism for advising and combining border matters between India and China will be improved by regularizing it. This will strengthen the trust between the two sides.
The two sides welcomed what was agreed in the recent Commander-level meeting. At the Commander-level meeting on July 1, the two sides agreed to reduce the tension on the border.
Earlier, the Indian Foreign Ministry had issued a statement saying that there has been a clear and detailed talk between Doval and Wang Yi about the recent activities on the western sector border between India and China.
It has been agreed on both sides that to strengthen bilateral relations, both countries must restore peace on the border and prevent differences from taking the form of a dispute.
In this direction, both sides have worked on the process of reducing the tension on the border, that is, the situation is not as it was when the soldiers of both sides came face to face. Both sides have agreed to do it step by step in a phased manner.
The statement also said that in this conversation of the two special representatives, it has been agreed to continue the dialogue between the military and diplomatic officials of the two countries.
Apart from this, there has been an agreement to keep regular interactions between Doval and Wang Yi.
At the same time, according to news agency AFP, China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told reporters in Beijing on Monday, "There has been positive progress on both sides to reduce the tension on the border."
Lijian has expressed hope that the Indian side will step forward with China to implement the things that have been mutually agreed upon.
Officials watching the India-China border dispute have told the BBC that the process to reduce the border tension has started from Monday morning.
Officials said that this work is going on in three places, these places are Galvan, Gogra and Hot Springs. The official briefing the BBC made it clear that they were not talking about Depsang or Pangong Tso Lake.
Another official said, "Both the tents and temporary structures are being removed and the troops are retreating. But this does not mean the withdrawal or the end of the episode."
Indian officials said that these activities are constantly being monitored, for which the help of satellite images and high platforms is being taken.
In response to the question of how many Chinese soldiers have been withdrawn, several media reports said, the official refused to give any distance.
He said this much, "This is the beginning of the process that was decided after the meeting of the commanders of both sides in Chusul on 30 June".
However, according to reports coming in the media, the Chinese soldiers are going backwards two kilometers from where the violence took place in Galvan.
It is noteworthy that on June 15, there was a violent clash between the soldiers of India and China in the Galvan Valley, in which 20 Indian soldiers were killed.
Subsequently, on July 1, there was a commander-level dialogue between the armies of the two countries and in that negotiation, it was agreed to reduce the tension on the India-China LAC.
Then a week ago, the Government of India announced the closure of 59 mobile apps, including UC Browser of WeChat Ali Baba Group, the well-known social platform TikTok.
Although the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting of India did not take the name of China, it was clear that the complaint was received that these apps on Android and iOS were also interfering with the personal data of the people. Restrictions on these apps will secure India's mobile and Internet users. It is essential for India's security, integrity and sovereignty.
Copyright © 2025 SHAHEEN BAGH NEWS All rights reserved. Powered by USMAN EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY. The SHAHEEN BAGH NEWS is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking